Monitor & ingest
Jurisdiction-aware feeds—regulators, supervisors, consultations, official journals—normalized into a single change stream with source, jurisdiction, and effective dates.
/ Riesgo y cumplimiento /
Monitorización continua del cambio regulatorio con mapeo de impacto sobre tus controles existentes—para que cumplimiento pase de reactivo a preparado.
The problem
GDPR, DORA, EU AI Act, sectoral guidance, local supervisors—each compliance team chases its own feeds, and nothing reconciles into a single jurisdictional view of what applies and where.
Analysts skim PDFs, supervisor letters, and consultation drafts to find what changed. Critical updates surface late, and prioritization depends on who happened to read what.
A new clause lands, but no one can tell which internal control, policy, or process it touches. Mapping is rebuilt from scratch every cycle, by hand, on best-effort.
When auditors ask how a regulatory change was tracked, assessed, and reflected in controls, the trail is fragmented across emails, spreadsheets, and memories—not in a system of record.
Cómo funciona
Jurisdiction-aware feeds—regulators, supervisors, consultations, official journals—normalized into a single change stream with source, jurisdiction, and effective dates.
Each change is classified by topic and severity and mapped to the controls, policies, and processes it touches—reviewed by compliance, not blindly accepted.
Owners get alerts with proposed actions; every assessment, decision, and update is captured as audit-ready evidence with full lineage.
Flow is adapted to your jurisdictions, control library, and audit cadence.
Qué incluye
Monitoring, mapping, and evidence in a single layer—delivered on Synapse with compliance-owned review gates and audit lineage from day one.
Curated feeds per jurisdiction and topic—GDPR, DORA, EU AI Act, sectoral and local supervisors—normalized into one stream.
Each item tagged by topic, severity, effective date, and applicable entities—so compliance triages by priority, not by inbox order.
Controls, policies, and processes linked to the clauses they implement; mapping is reviewed and versioned, not re-derived each cycle.
Proposed impact score per change with explanation—compliance can challenge, adjust, and lock the final assessment with a named reviewer.
Owners receive targeted alerts with proposed actions and deadlines; escalation paths are explicit and tracked.
Every change, assessment, and control update traces back to source, reviewer, and date—exportable for internal audit and supervisors.
Impulsado por Synapse
Resultados
Results vary by context, jurisdictional scope, and control maturity. We scope honestly before we promise precisely.
50–70%
less analyst time on manual change scanning and triage
Orientative—varies by feed scope and team size.
Days
from publication to mapped impact, instead of weeks
Orientative—based on early implementations.
Full
evidence trail for every change, assessment, and control update
Cómo trabajamos
Week 1–2
Map current regulatory feeds, control library, key jurisdictions, and the decisions compliance needs the system to support.
Week 3–5
Define classification taxonomy, impact scoring, mapping rules, and review gates for compliance ownership.
Week 6–10
Integrate feeds, configure jurisdictional logic, build mapping to your control library, design the assessment workflow.
Week 11+
Audit sign-off, compliance-owned operations, expand jurisdictions and topics over time.
Timelines vary by jurisdictional scope, control library maturity, and audit requirements.
Primer paso
No commitment. We start with a scoped session to map your jurisdictions, controls, and audit needs.