Mine the knowledge
AI extracts business rules, data flows, and dependencies from the legacy codebase into a queryable knowledge graph your engineers actually use.
/ IT 与数据 /
通过 AI 辅助重构、回归测试自动生成与治理门禁,逐步告别 COBOL、主机与老化 Java——每个迭代都交付价值。
The problem
Critical logic lives in code nobody under fifty understands. Every change becomes a multi-team coordination exercise, and new features queue behind the legacy team.
Documentation is patchy at best. As original authors leave, the safe answer to 'why this rule exists' is 'don't touch it'—and the modernization plan stalls.
Two-year rewrites lose sponsorship, miss the business reality that moves under them, and end as parallel systems neither team wants to own.
When auditors ask what the system actually does today, the answer is a person plus a debugger. Modernization without that lineage is a leap of faith.
运作方式
AI extracts business rules, data flows, and dependencies from the legacy codebase into a queryable knowledge graph your engineers actually use.
Governed prompts translate legacy modules into target stacks; regression tests are generated from observed behavior, not from imagined specs.
Incremental cutover by capability with rollback, audit trail of every AI-generated change, and CISO-ready evidence of human review.
Flow adapts to your target stack, regulatory context, and team velocity.
包含内容
Code mining, AI-assisted translation, governance gates, and audit trail in a single layer—delivered with your engineering team owning the rollout cadence.
Business rules, data flows, and dependencies extracted into a queryable graph engineers can search and trust.
Governed prompts translate modules into the target stack, with human review gates and policy enforcement.
Capability-by-capability cutover with feature flags, rollback, and parallel-run validation.
Tests synthesized from observed legacy behavior—not from incomplete specs—so cutover risk is measurable.
Security, IP, and compliance review built into the AI workflow; no ungoverned co-pilot sprawl.
Up-to-date docs are a byproduct of the migration, not a side project that ages out of date.
成果
Results vary by legacy stack, regulatory context, and team maturity. We scope honestly before we promise precisely.
40–60%
less time per module to refactor vs. manual baseline
Orientative—varies by language and code quality.
12 weeks
median time to first production capability cutover
Orientative—based on early implementations.
Full
audit trail of AI-generated and human-reviewed changes
合作方式
Week 1–3
Map legacy stack, business-critical modules, regulatory constraints, and target architecture.
Week 4–6
Define governance gates, target stack, cutover sequence, and how AI assistance fits your security model.
Week 7–14
Mine knowledge, refactor first capabilities, generate regression tests, and ship the first cutover.
Week 15+
Roll out by capability, decommission legacy modules, expand to adjacent systems.
Timelines vary by legacy complexity, regulatory exposure, and team capacity.
开始
No commitment. We start with a scoped session to map your stack, constraints, and target architecture.