Instrument & catalog
Auto-discover sources, tag PII, capture column-level lineage, and assign ownership—so the catalog reflects reality, not last year's diagram.
The problem
The architecture deck shows clean data flows, but no one can answer "which source fed this column on this date" without paging the engineer who built it three years ago.
Freshness, completeness, and accuracy live in tribal memory. Analysts notice issues by anomaly in a chart; the platform never warned them.
Sensitive columns are masked in some pipelines and not others. Consent flags live in CRM but don't propagate to the lake, so AI models train on data they shouldn't see.
Legal and risk get involved late, the model passes pilot but fails audit, and rework lands on the team that already shipped.
运作方式
Auto-discover sources, tag PII, capture column-level lineage, and assign ownership—so the catalog reflects reality, not last year's diagram.
Quality SLAs as code, consent and policy checks at ingest and serving, and alerts when a dataset drifts from contract.
Every model, report, and dashboard traces back to inputs, owners, and policy decisions—one click to the audit-ready report.
Layer plugs into your existing warehouse, lake, and BI tools.
包含内容
Lineage, quality, consent, and audit—delivered as one operating layer your data, AI, and risk teams share.
Trace every column back to source systems and forward to dashboards, models, and exports—automatically refreshed.
Freshness, completeness, schema, and distribution checks as code—with named owners and alerting when contracts break.
Sensitive-data discovery, classification, and policy-based masking across pipelines and serving endpoints.
Track customer consent state and propagate it from source-of-truth to every downstream model and report.
Business glossary, dataset owners, stewards, and certification status—surfaced where analysts work.
One-click lineage, quality, and consent reports formatted for internal audit and external regulators.
技术提供 Synapse
成果
Results vary by context, data maturity, and scope. We scope honestly before we promise precisely.
70%
less effort preparing audit and lineage reports
Orientative—depends on starting documentation maturity.
Hours
to answer regulator questions that previously took weeks
Orientative—based on early implementations.
Lower
risk of AI models training on non-consented or PII data
合作方式
Week 1–2
Inventory critical data assets, current lineage gaps, PII exposure, and regulator requirements.
Week 3–5
Define quality SLAs, lineage scope, consent model, and ownership map with data, AI, and risk teams.
Week 6–10
Instrument pipelines, populate catalog, enable policy enforcement, and deliver first audit-ready report.
Week 11+
Hand over to data governance team and expand coverage across domains by quarter.
Timelines vary by source-system complexity, regulatory scope, and existing catalog tooling.
开始
No commitment. We start with a scoped session to map your data, regulations, and audit pain.