Assess & cost
Inventory legacy workloads, build TCO model for current vs. target architecture, and prioritize migrations by cost, risk, and analytics value.
/ TI e dados /
Migra warehouses legacy para arquitetura cloud moderna—mantendo os relatórios a correr, reduzindo custo e desbloqueando analítica em tempo real.
The problem
Hardware refresh cycles, licensing tiers, and overnight batches drive total cost up year on year, while utilization sits below 40% off-peak.
Reports need to land before 7am, but ingestion volumes outgrew the window. Engineers tune jobs every quarter just to keep yesterday's SLAs.
Real-time decisions live in operational systems while leadership waits for the next morning's batch—and the gap keeps widening.
Past migration attempts ran in parallel for years, reports diverged, and the team can't agree on a date when legacy is finally retired.
Como funciona
Inventory legacy workloads, build TCO model for current vs. target architecture, and prioritize migrations by cost, risk, and analytics value.
Move ETL to ELT, re-architect models on cloud-native engines, and run reconciliation in parallel so business reports stay correct end-to-end.
Orchestrated cutover with rollback gates, full performance tuning, and a dated decommission plan—so legacy actually leaves the estate.
Approach adapts to your target platform: Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks, or hybrid.
O que inclui
Assessment, migration, governance, and decommissioning—delivered as one program your data and finance teams can sign off on.
Workload inventory, dependency map, and side-by-side cost comparison for legacy vs. target architecture.
Refactor pipelines to cloud-native patterns with incremental loads, schema evolution, and contract enforcement.
Parallel runs, reconciliation reports, and gated cutover with rollback paths so business reports never break.
Move access policies, lineage, and catalog metadata to the new platform—no governance regression at go-live.
Workload-aware tuning, clustering, and warehouse sizing so cost lands where the TCO model promised.
Dated retirement schedule with stakeholder sign-off—legacy actually leaves the estate, not just runs in parallel forever.
Com tecnologia de Synapse
Resultados
Results vary by context, data maturity, and scope. We scope honestly before we promise precisely.
30–50%
lower run cost vs. legacy warehouse at steady state
Orientative—depends on starting workload and licensing.
Minutes
freshness for dashboards that previously waited for overnight batch
Orientative—based on ELT-modernized workloads.
Dated
decommission plan for legacy, with stakeholder sign-off
Como trabalhamos
Week 1–4
Workload inventory, dependency map, TCO model, and target architecture decision.
Week 5–8
Pipeline patterns, governance migration plan, cutover sequence, and reconciliation framework.
Week 9–20
Move workloads in waves, run parallel reconciliation, tune performance, and validate business reports.
Week 21+
Dated cutover per workload, decommission legacy, and operate the new platform with cost monitoring.
Timelines vary by warehouse size, dependency complexity, and report-validation surface.
Começar
No commitment. We start with a scoped session to map workloads, TCO, and cutover risk.