Enrich the event
Payments, logins, and applications are joined with device, graph, and historical behaviour signals.
/ Knowledge & Governance /
Real-time AI that detects anomalous patterns, flags suspicious transactions and reduces false positives — so your risk team acts on signal, not noise.
The problem
Static rules work until fraudsters adapt. New attack patterns bypass existing controls until someone notices and updates the rules.
Overly aggressive detection blocks legitimate customers. Every false positive is a friction event — and a potential churn event.
Analysts review flagged cases manually. The queue grows faster than the team can work through it.
Fraud patterns evolve faster than rule and model updates. Detection quality decays until losses or false positives spike.
How it works
Payments, logins, and applications are joined with device, graph, and historical behaviour signals.
Models rank risk with reason codes analysts can challenge—reducing black-box rejections.
Investigation outcomes feed labels and thresholds so the next similar pattern is caught earlier.
Rules and models can run in parallel during migration—no big-bang cutover.
What's included
A governed layer across data, workflows, and handoffs—so teams ship safely and scale with metrics.
Assesses every transaction for fraud probability at the moment it occurs.
Learns normal patterns per user, account or entity and flags deviations.
Retrains on new fraud patterns continuously without requiring manual rule updates.
Contextual scoring that distinguishes suspicious from legitimate unusual behaviour.
Ranks flagged cases by risk score and evidence strength so analysts focus on what matters.
Full decision log for every flagged transaction, formatted for regulatory submission.
Powered by Thinkia Sentinel
Results
Results vary by transaction volume, fraud typology and existing detection infrastructure.
+40%
Improvement vs. rule-based baseline on adaptive fraud patterns
–35%
Reduction in legitimate transactions incorrectly flagged
–50%
With AI-prioritised queue and pre-assembled evidence
How we work
Week 1–2
Fraud typologies, data feeds, and investigation workflows are baselined with your SOC/FIU.
Week 3–5
Scores, tiers, and override paths are tuned for precision/recall and regulatory expectations.
Week 6–9
Shadow scoring on live traffic; investigators validate alerts and narrative quality.
Week 10+
Feedback loops, drift monitoring, and periodic model reviews enter BAU governance.
Latency and explainability requirements vary by product line; scope follows highest-loss flows first.
Get started
We start with a focused session—no commitment—to map constraints and a sensible path.