Source & match
Multi-channel sourcing pulls from your ATS, talent communities, and external sources—semantic matching ranks candidates against the role, not just the keyword list.
/ People /
AI-assisted sourcing and screening—governed bias controls, recruiter-in-the-loop, and pipelines that surface candidates your team would have missed.
The problem
Inbound volume keeps climbing and recruiters spend their day on first-pass triage instead of conversations with the candidates that actually fit the role.
Strong profiles slip through because nobody had time to read past the keyword match—the funnel optimizes for speed, not for the candidates you'd most regret losing.
Bias reviews happen quarterly in a slide, not in the workflow. There's no live signal when a screening pattern starts to drift, and no override trail when recruiters correct it.
Specialist and senior roles stall because sourcing is manual, market mapping is one-off, and the same pipeline gets rebuilt from scratch every requisition.
How it works
Multi-channel sourcing pulls from your ATS, talent communities, and external sources—semantic matching ranks candidates against the role, not just the keyword list.
Bias detection runs on the ranking itself, not just the outcome—recruiters see why a candidate scored where they did and can override with a reason that lands in the audit log.
The recruiter workbench surfaces the shortlist with context, suggested outreach, and the candidate experience layer keeps applicants informed at every step.
Pipeline configuration follows your ATS, role families, and compliance posture.
What's included
Pipelines, governance, and recruiter tooling in a single layer—delivered with bias controls, override accountability, and integration to the ATS your team already runs.
Pulls candidates from ATS, talent communities, and external sources into a single ranked pipeline per requisition.
Matches candidates against the role's responsibilities and skills, not just keyword overlap—surfacing profiles a keyword filter would have dropped.
Live signals when ranking patterns drift on protected attributes; recruiter overrides land in an auditable trail with reasons.
Shortlist, context, and suggested outreach in one view—so recruiters spend their time on conversations, not on tab-switching.
Bi-directional sync with your ATS keeps requisition, stage, and disposition data consistent—no parallel system to maintain.
Status updates, expectations, and next steps communicated automatically—so candidates don't go silent waiting for the recruiter.
Powered by AI Contact Experience
Results
Results vary by context, data maturity, and scope. We scope honestly before we promise precisely.
−40%
time recruiters spend on first-pass screening
Orientative—varies by inbound volume and role mix.
+20–30%
shortlist quality as rated by hiring managers
Orientative—based on early implementations.
Full
audit trail of ranking signals, overrides, and dispositions
How we work
Week 1–2
Map current sourcing channels, ATS configuration, recruiter workflow, and the bias controls you already operate under.
Week 3–5
Define role-family taxonomies, ranking criteria, bias-monitoring metrics, and the recruiter override UX.
Week 6–10
Integrate ATS and sourcing channels, train semantic matching against historical hires, ship the recruiter workbench.
Week 11+
Compliance sign-off, recruiter enablement, expand role families and channels by hiring cycle.
Timelines vary by ATS complexity, role-family breadth, and jurisdictional requirements.
Get started
No commitment. We start with a scoped session to map your sourcing channels, ATS, and bias-control needs.